Tos II Part II

The Constitutional Challenge to AB 1899

The California High-Speed Rail Authority, CHSRA, relied on AB 1899 in its submission of funding plans in early 2017. (See first paragraph of Tos II Part I for more background.)

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Petitioners filed their Memo in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on First Cause of Action (for Declaratory Relief), along with a Request for Judicial Notice.

CHSRA filed its Opposition to the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, its RJN in Opposition to the Motion, and its Objections to Petitioners RJN.

Petitioners filed their Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Declaratory Relief, along with their Response to Objections to RJN and their own Objections to Respondents RJN.

The Court was unmoved by Petitioners’ oral arguments at the October 26, 2018 hearing, and adopted his tentative ruling without any changes. Since that time, Petitioners have been considering their legal options.

Comments are closed.